CAUSAL INFERENCE · VANDERWEELE & DING (ANN INTERN MED 2017)
VanderWeele E-value Calculator & Reviewer Rebuttal Generator
Quantify how strong an unmeasured confounder must be to explain away an observed treatment–outcome association in observational cohort studies. Instant calculation, bias threshold plotting, and ready-to-copy manuscript & rebuttal paragraphs.
1. Input Effect Estimate & 95% CI
2. E-value Results & Bias Threshold Curve
Methodology: How VanderWeele’s E-value Quantifies Unmeasured Confounding
In observational clinical cohort studies (retrospective EHR cohorts, registries, and real-world evidence studies), reviewers frequently question whether an observed association could be explained away by unmeasured confounders (e.g., frailty, socioeconomic status, or undocumented medication adherence). According to VanderWeele and Ding (Annals of Internal Medicine, 2017;167(4):268–274), the E-value is defined as the minimum strength of association, on the risk ratio scale, that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the treatment/exposure and the outcome to fully explain away a specific treatment–outcome association, conditional on the measured covariates.
Mathematical Formula
- RR > 1:
E-value = RR + √(RR × (RR - 1)) - RR < 1 (Protective Effect):
RR* = 1 / RR,E-value = RR* + √(RR* × (RR* - 1)) - OR / HR (Common outcome ≥ 15%):
RR ≈ √OR